The Language of Cancer

One of the problems I have is in the language people currently use to talk about cancer. It’s nearly always tied up with metaphors and images of battle, losing, winning etc. It may be a useful enough way to think about it at first but the problem is that where there are winners there are also losers and if your cancer returns as mine has I think you can feel more defeated if you’ve got into using the figurative language of battle than if you haven’t.

I can’t really explain to anyone how utterly awful, angry, aghast & yes defeated I felt when my cancer returned after a brief absence. I felt as if I’d done all the “right” things ie adopted a vegan diet, had acupuncture, herbalism and homeopathy in addition to conventional medicine, meditated and above all maintained a spirited determination to overcome it. If all it took was having a positive outlook (as so many people seem to think is all you need) then cancer wouldn’t have dared to come back into my body.

I remember something that my late aunt Florence said and that I have often pondered on especially since I’ve had cancer myself. She had breast cancer at 40 and survived it, lung cancer at 57 necessitating the removal of one lung which she also survived before dying finally at the age of 74 from a brain tumour which amazingly turned out to be a secondary from her lung cancer of 17 years previously.

She said that she got very angry when she read in the papers about people saying they were going to fight cancer and that they were sure they’d win. “When I had my lung cancer I didn’t want to win. Uncle Stan (her late husband) had just died and I was desperate to join him. I hoped I’d die and yet I lived. Having a fighting spirit and a positive outlook is nothing at all to do with it. When your time’s up, your time’s up.”

I often think about this and a large part of me believes that she was right. The emphasis put by the media and some people on fighting cancer etc makes those of us in whom it has returned feel like failures, as if there is more we could have done to stop this bloody dreadful scourge from ravaging our bodies. In many ways it places the “blame” on the sufferers.

I can’t think of any other language we could use in describing either cancer or the struggle of individuals against it and I have been thinking about this for some time.

2 thoughts on “The Language of Cancer

  1. Jack Folsom

    Yes, I agree that the battle imagery used for cancer cases is a bit silly. Cancer patients do what they can to get better and/or to survive, but the imagery of winning and losing implies predictable outcomes based upon “military” strength or weakness when in fact the actual outcomes are more often than not a matter of chance. The article about the ‘black swan theory’ makes better sense to me than trusting armchair explanations after the fact, or smug predictions based upon masses of probably irrelevant data.
    The language of cancer should acknowledge the fallibility of predictions and expectations. At odd times, shit happens, and miracles happen. The most sensible commodity is hope.
    I do agree, Elaine, that after all of the prevention and maintenance that you’ve practiced, this latest return of your cancer seems unfair–especially when Joe Blow over there has done nothing to help himself and is doing just fine.

  2. Sandy

    Yes I’ve noticed the militaristic metaphors people use when talking about cancer – but they don’t use them when someone has a broken leg! -I’ve enclosed a link to an interesting article about the ‘black swan theory’ whcih I think is a refreshing alternative to the kind of reductionist attitudes such people espouse.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2067419,00.html

Leave a Reply